Studies.hu
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit an article
  • Browse
No Result
View All Result
Studies.hu
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit an article
  • Browse
No Result
View All Result
Studies.hu
No Result
View All Result
Home Browse 2025 - Volume 127 Volume 127 - Issue 1

Economic impacts of banning the enriched cage housing system in Hungarian table egg production

byERDOS, Adel Dorottya,SZILI, Viktor,SZABO, ZsoltandEGRI, Edit
  • Year 2025
  • Volume 127
  • Issue 1
  • Pages 80-87

This study aims to examine the economic impacts of phasing out enriched cages in Hungarian table egg production. An online questionnaire survey was conducted among 42 enriched cage egg producers and in-depth interviews were carried out with barn and aviary egg producers, as well as a company specialised in designing and implementing housing systems for laying hens, using economic and physical efficiency data for the year 2021 from egg producers. Economic situation was examined via a simulation model, which was based on on deterministic principles. The results indicate that aviary and barn housing systems exhibit lower physical efficiency and weaker economic indicators when compared to the enriched cage housing system. Aviaries and barns showed reduced egg production per hen (-7% and -12%, respectively), increased feed conversion ratio (FCR) (+17% and +24%), reduced labour efficiency (-40% in both cases), and increased mortality rate (+2.49 and +3.31 percentage points). Key determinants of unit gross margin alterations were found to be egg production per hen, the share of class ‘A’ eggs, FCR, and pullet acquisition cost. Aviary housing systems proved as profitable as enriched cage systems in terms of gross margin per egg, whereas barn housing systems were unprofitable based on 2021 data. However, those barn eggs producers who sell directly to consumers can still be profitable. The investment payback periods of enriched cage (7 years) and aviary (10 years) housing system differ. In conclusion, aviaries and barns could not outperform the enriched cage housing system in economic terms.

Tags: aviarybarnenriched cagegross margininvestment costlaying hen
  • https://doi.org/10.7896/j.3070
Download PDF
Previous Post

Estimating demand elasticities of mineral nitrogen fertiliser: some empirical evidence in the case of Sweden

Next Post

Climate change and rice production: Empirical evidence from Vietnam

Search

No Result
View All Result

Journal Metrics

Scimago Journal & Country Rank

 

 

 

 

  • Scopus SJR (2025): 0.27
  • Scopus CiteScore (2025): 2.0
  • WoS Journal Impact Factor (2024): 1.0
  • WoS 5 year Impact Factor (2024): 1.2
  • ISSN (electronic): 2063-0476
  • ISSN-L 1418-2106

 

Impressum

Publisher Name: Institute of Agricultural Economics Nonprofit Kft. (AKI)

Publisher Headquarters: Zsil utca 3-5, 1093-Budapest, Hungary

Name of Responsible Person for Publishing:        Dr. Pal Goda

Name of Responsible Person for Editing:             Dr. Attila Jambor

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The publication cost of the journal is supported by the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.

GDPR – Content Alert

 

GDPR – Submission

 

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement (PEMS)

 

Instructions for Authors

Most viewed

Crises and Competitiveness: Analysing the European Wine Trade Response to Economic Shocks

byBALOGH, Jeremias
17/04/2026
0

In recent years, the European wine industry has faced rising global competition, changing consumer preferences, and repeated economic crises. This...

Profitability Gaps and Convergence in Field-Crop Farms: A Decomposition for the Visegrad Countries, Austria, and Germany

byBEYER, DirkandHINKE, Jana
17/04/2026
0

This study investigates profitability gaps and convergence in field-crop farms across Austria, Germany, and the Visegrad countries, benchmarked against the...

Assessment of Sustainability Reporting from the EU Taxonomy Perspective: Evidence from Food-Processing Companies in the Visegrad Group

byROZSA, Andrea,HAMORI, Judit,GOMBKOTO, Nora,KACZ, Karoly,KIRALOVA, Alzbeta,CHMIELINSKI, Pawel,WIELICZKO, Barbara,MARIS, Martin,MARISOVA, Eleonora,BAER-NAWROCKA, Agnieszka,LAMFALUSI, IbolyaandGODA, Pal
17/04/2026
0

This study assesses the sustainability reporting practices of large food-processing companies in the Visegrad countries from the perspective of the...

Marketing and subsidy effects on farm income distribution: evidence from Kosovo

byKOSTOV, Philip,GJOKAJ, EkremandDAVIDOVA, Sophia
17/04/2026
0

This paper investigates the effect of instruments of agricultural policy support and marketing contracts on the farm income distribution in...

Keywords

adoption (6) agri-food trade (4) agricultural exports (3) agricultural policy (3) agriculture (13) AKIS (4) Albania (5) CAP (4) Central and Eastern Europe (3) climate change (7) Common Agricultural Policy (4) competitiveness (5) consumer behaviour (4) consumer preferences (5) Covid-19 (7) dairy sector (3) digitalisation (4) economic growth (3) efficiency (4) elasticity (3) European Union (8) FADN (3) family farms (4) farm income (3) farm performance (3) food security (6) Hungary (6) impact evaluation (4) innovation (5) Kosovo (4) LEADER (4) off-farm income (4) policy (4) price transmission (3) productivity (3) profitability (6) resilience (3) risk management (3) rural areas (4) rural development (13) sustainability (8) sustainable agriculture (5) sustainable development (4) technical efficiency (6) Ukraine (4)
Institute of Agricultural Economics
  • Home
  • About
  • Browse
  • Submission
© 2019 Copyright All rights reserved.
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit an article
  • Browse

© 2019 Copyright All rights reserved.

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.