Studies.hu
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit an article
  • Browse
No Result
View All Result
Studies.hu
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit an article
  • Browse
No Result
View All Result
Studies.hu
No Result
View All Result
Home Browse 2025 - Volume 127 Volume 127 - Issue 1

Economic impacts of banning the enriched cage housing system in Hungarian table egg production

byERDOS, Adel Dorottya,SZILI, Viktor,SZABO, ZsoltandEGRI, Edit
  • Year 2025
  • Volume 127
  • Issue 1
  • Pages 80-87

This study aims to examine the economic impacts of phasing out enriched cages in Hungarian table egg production. An online questionnaire survey was conducted among 42 enriched cage egg producers and in-depth interviews were carried out with barn and aviary egg producers, as well as a company specialised in designing and implementing housing systems for laying hens, using economic and physical efficiency data for the year 2021 from egg producers. Economic situation was examined via a simulation model, which was based on on deterministic principles. The results indicate that aviary and barn housing systems exhibit lower physical efficiency and weaker economic indicators when compared to the enriched cage housing system. Aviaries and barns showed reduced egg production per hen (-7% and -12%, respectively), increased feed conversion ratio (FCR) (+17% and +24%), reduced labour efficiency (-40% in both cases), and increased mortality rate (+2.49 and +3.31 percentage points). Key determinants of unit gross margin alterations were found to be egg production per hen, the share of class ‘A’ eggs, FCR, and pullet acquisition cost. Aviary housing systems proved as profitable as enriched cage systems in terms of gross margin per egg, whereas barn housing systems were unprofitable based on 2021 data. However, those barn eggs producers who sell directly to consumers can still be profitable. The investment payback periods of enriched cage (7 years) and aviary (10 years) housing system differ. In conclusion, aviaries and barns could not outperform the enriched cage housing system in economic terms.

Tags: aviarybarnenriched cagegross margininvestment costlaying hen
  • https://doi.org/10.7896/j.3070
Download PDF
Previous Post

Estimating demand elasticities of mineral nitrogen fertiliser: some empirical evidence in the case of Sweden

Next Post

Climate change and rice production: Empirical evidence from Vietnam

Search

No Result
View All Result

Journal Metrics

Scimago Journal & Country Rank

 

 

 

 

  • Scopus SJR (2024): 0.37
  • Scopus CiteScore (2022): 2.0
  • WoS Journal Impact Factor (2023): 0.9
  • WoS Journal Citation Indicator (2023): 0.33
  • ISSN (electronic): 2063-0476
  • ISSN-L 1418-2106

 

Impressum

Publisher Name: Institute of Agricultural Economics Nonprofit Kft. (AKI)

Publisher Headquarters: Zsil utca 3-5, 1093-Budapest, Hungary

Name of Responsible Person for Publishing:        Dr. Pal Goda

Name of Responsible Person for Editing:             Dr. Attila Jambor

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The publication cost of the journal is supported by the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.

GDPR – Content Alert

 

GDPR – Submission

 

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement (PEMS)

 

Instructions for Authors

Most viewed

Economic Diversification Potential: Insights from Mongolia’s Livestock Product Value Chains

byDAGYS, Kadirbyek,HEIJMAN, Wim,DRIES, Liesbeth,AGIPAR, Bakyei,YETYEKBAI, Myeruyert,DAMDINSUREN, MyagmarsurenandTSAMBA, Gantulga
16/04/2025
0

Mongolia, endowed with abundant natural resources, faces a critical challenge in reducing its reliance on the mining sector and achieving...

The Effects of Investment Support on Performance of Farms: The Case of Application of the Rural Development Programme in Slovakia

byPOKRIVCAK, Jan,MICHALEK, Jerzy,CIAIAN, Pavel,PIHULIC, MarekandSOPAJ HOXHA, Leonora
16/04/2025
0

The paper estimates the firm level impact of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) investment subsidies on gross value added, profits,...

Farm Characteristics and Resources: The C5.0 Classification Tree as a Means Towards Understanding Finnish Family Farmers’ Perceptions of Success

byYIGIT, Furkan,SIPILAINEN, TimoandRANTAMAKI-LAHTINEN, Leena
16/04/2025
0

This study investigates the classification of the family farmers’ perceptions of success, based on characteristics and resources. The empirical analysis...

The Impact of Climate Change on Food Security: Evidence from Panel Data Analysis in Central Asia

byBOPUSHEV, Stalbek,TOKOBAEV, NurlanandSULTAKEEV, Kadyrbek
16/04/2025
0

Climate change leads to various impacts, including reduced production, lower crop yields, land degradation, soil erosion, and overall, food insecurity....

Keywords

adoption (6) agricultural exports (3) agriculture (13) AKIS (4) Albania (4) CAP (4) Central and Eastern Europe (3) climate change (7) Common Agricultural Policy (3) competitiveness (5) consumer preferences (4) Covid-19 (6) Data Envelopment Analysis (3) DEA (3) digitalisation (4) economic growth (3) efficiency (3) elasticity (3) European Integration (3) European Union (8) family farms (4) food security (4) Hungary (5) impact evaluation (4) innovation (4) Kosovo (3) LEADER (4) maize (3) off-farm income (4) participation (3) policy (4) price transmission (3) profitability (4) propensity score matching (3) risk management (3) rural areas (4) rural development (13) social capital (3) social innovation (3) Structural Funds (3) sustainability (6) sustainable agriculture (4) sustainable development (4) technical efficiency (6) Ukraine (4)
Institute of Agricultural Economics
  • Home
  • About
  • Browse
  • Submission
© 2019 Copyright All rights reserved.
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit an article
  • Browse

© 2019 Copyright All rights reserved.

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.