Studies.hu
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit an article
  • Browse
No Result
View All Result
Studies.hu
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit an article
  • Browse
No Result
View All Result
Studies.hu
No Result
View All Result
Home Browse 2012 – Volume 114 Volume 114 - Issue 2

Social innovation and sustainability; how to disentangle the buzzword and its application in the field of agriculture and rural development

byBOCK, Bettina B.
  • Year 2012
  • Volume 114
  • Issue 2
  • Pages 57-63

Social innovation is often appointed as an essential part of agricultural and rural innovation. Everybody seems to agree that social innovation is important but what exactly is meant by the term remains often unclear. This paper aims at clarifying the meaning and significance of the concept by going back to its root in innovation science and policy. It appoints three main interpretations of social innovation, referring to the social mechanism of innovation, the social responsibility of innovation and the need for innovating society. Studying its application in the field of agriculture and rural development reveals that social innovation is rarely referred to when agriculture as a singular economic activity is concerned, but prominently present in discussions about rural development. Here social innovation may be referred to when identifying society’s need for more sustainable production methods, the necessity for collaboration and social learning, and the scope of change needed for revitalising (rural) society. Often, however, social innovation is presented as a tangle of interdependent processes and beneficial outcomes. Its fuzziness contributes to its discursive power in discussions about agricultural politics and the significance of sustainability, but also hides the valued-loadedness of social innovation. As a result its critical potential becomes neutralised. For gaining more insight in how to more effectively support social innovation, it is important to disentangle the social innovation jumble, to unravel the diverse interrelations and to explore and monitor its functioning and contribution to processes of social change and renewal.

Tags: critical innovationresponsible innovationrural developmentrural governancesocial innovationsustainable agriculture
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.7896/j.1209
Download PDF
Previous Post

Facilitating Agricultural Innovation Systems: a critical realist approach

Next Post

Agricultural monopolistic competitor and the Pigovian tax

Search

No Result
View All Result

Journal Metrics

Scimago Journal & Country Rank

 

 

 

 

  • Scopus SJR (2024): 0.37
  • Scopus CiteScore (2022): 2.0
  • WoS Journal Impact Factor (2023): 0.9
  • WoS Journal Citation Indicator (2023): 0.33
  • ISSN (electronic): 2063-0476
  • ISSN-L 1418-2106

 

Impressum

Publisher Name: Institute of Agricultural Economics Nonprofit Kft. (AKI)

Publisher Headquarters: Zsil utca 3-5, 1093-Budapest, Hungary

Name of Responsible Person for Publishing:        Dr. Pal Goda

Name of Responsible Person for Editing:             Dr. Attila Jambor

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The publication cost of the journal is supported by the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.

GDPR – Content Alert

 

GDPR – Submission

 

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement (PEMS)

 

Instructions for Authors

Most viewed

Economic Diversification Potential: Insights from Mongolia’s Livestock Product Value Chains

byDAGYS, Kadirbyek,HEIJMAN, Wim,DRIES, Liesbeth,AGIPAR, Bakyei,YETYEKBAI, Myeruyert,DAMDINSUREN, MyagmarsurenandTSAMBA, Gantulga
16/04/2025
0

Mongolia, endowed with abundant natural resources, faces a critical challenge in reducing its reliance on the mining sector and achieving...

The Effects of Investment Support on Performance of Farms: The Case of Application of the Rural Development Programme in Slovakia

byPOKRIVCAK, Jan,MICHALEK, Jerzy,CIAIAN, Pavel,PIHULIC, MarekandSOPAJ HOXHA, Leonora
16/04/2025
0

The paper estimates the firm level impact of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) investment subsidies on gross value added, profits,...

Farm Characteristics and Resources: The C5.0 Classification Tree as a Means Towards Understanding Finnish Family Farmers’ Perceptions of Success

byYIGIT, Furkan,SIPILAINEN, TimoandRANTAMAKI-LAHTINEN, Leena
16/04/2025
0

This study investigates the classification of the family farmers’ perceptions of success, based on characteristics and resources. The empirical analysis...

The Impact of Climate Change on Food Security: Evidence from Panel Data Analysis in Central Asia

byBOPUSHEV, Stalbek,TOKOBAEV, NurlanandSULTAKEEV, Kadyrbek
16/04/2025
0

Climate change leads to various impacts, including reduced production, lower crop yields, land degradation, soil erosion, and overall, food insecurity....

Keywords

adoption (6) agricultural exports (3) agriculture (13) AKIS (4) Albania (4) CAP (4) Central and Eastern Europe (3) climate change (7) Common Agricultural Policy (3) competitiveness (5) consumer preferences (4) Covid-19 (6) Data Envelopment Analysis (3) DEA (3) digitalisation (4) economic growth (3) efficiency (3) elasticity (3) European Integration (3) European Union (8) family farms (4) food security (4) Hungary (5) impact evaluation (4) innovation (4) Kosovo (3) LEADER (4) maize (3) off-farm income (4) participation (3) policy (4) price transmission (3) profitability (4) propensity score matching (3) risk management (3) rural areas (4) rural development (13) social capital (3) social innovation (3) Structural Funds (3) sustainability (6) sustainable agriculture (4) sustainable development (4) technical efficiency (6) Ukraine (4)
Institute of Agricultural Economics
  • Home
  • About
  • Browse
  • Submission
© 2019 Copyright All rights reserved.
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit an article
  • Browse

© 2019 Copyright All rights reserved.

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.