Studies.hu
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit an article
  • Browse
No Result
View All Result
Studies.hu
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit an article
  • Browse
No Result
View All Result
Studies.hu
No Result
View All Result
Home Browse 2015 – Volume 117 Volume 117 - Issue 3

Next steps to evidence-based food safety risk analysis: opportunities for health technology assessment methodology implementation

byPITTER, Janos G.,JOZWIAK, Akos,MARTOS, Eva,KALO, ZoltanandVOKO, Zoltan
  • Year 2015
  • Volume 117
  • Issue 3
  • Pages 155-161

Food safety risk analysis and health technology assessment (HTA) are two different paradigms sharing multiple common features. Decision makers in both fields have the responsibility to promote the health of society deciding on intervention opportunities based on disease burden, intervention feasibility, effectiveness and cost, equity and ethical considerations. The evolution of HTA in the last two decades has resulted in the establishment and widespread use of quantitative tools to support and justify evidence-based decisions. In contrast, decision making in the food safety domain is still a qualitative process rendering ad hoc weights to all aspects considered. This review evaluates whether HTA methodology is suitable for quantitative decision support in food safety risk analysis. We conclude that cost-utility analysis (CUA) could better serve the priority settings in food safety risk management than the currently (rarely) applied cost-benefit analysis (CBA), considering either broad resource allocation or specific safety measure decisions. Development of multi-criteria decision analysis tools could help the introduction of consistent and explicit weighting among cost and health impacts, equity and all other relevant aspects. Cost-minimisation and cost-effectiveness analyses would be relevant for ‘threshold’ and ‘as low as reasonably achievable’ approaches to single food safety risk assessments, respectively. Assuming a future widespread use of HTA methodology in the food safety paradigm, a vision of integrated healthcare, food safety and nutritional policy emerges, with the re-evaluation of budgets and resources of these large systems in a rational and socially acceptable way.

Tags: cost-utility analysisfoodborne diseasehealth technology assessmentMCDApriority settingrisk analysis
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.7896/j.1524
Download PDF
Previous Post

Adoption of multiple agricultural technologies in maize production of the Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia

Next Post

Social and technical infrastructure development of municipalities (gminas) in Poland

Search

No Result
View All Result

Journal Metrics

Scimago Journal & Country Rank

 

 

 

 

  • Scopus SJR (2024): 0.37
  • Scopus CiteScore (2024): 2.5
  • WoS Journal Impact Factor (2024): 1.0
  • WoS 5 year Impact Factor (2024): 1.2
  • ISSN (electronic): 2063-0476
  • ISSN-L 1418-2106

 

Impressum

Publisher Name: Institute of Agricultural Economics Nonprofit Kft. (AKI)

Publisher Headquarters: Zsil utca 3-5, 1093-Budapest, Hungary

Name of Responsible Person for Publishing:        Dr. Pal Goda

Name of Responsible Person for Editing:             Dr. Attila Jambor

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The publication cost of the journal is supported by the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.

GDPR – Content Alert

 

GDPR – Submission

 

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement (PEMS)

 

Instructions for Authors

Most viewed

Recent trends in agri-food trade and the future in a changing geopolitical environment

bySANTERAMO, Fabio G.
21/08/2025
0

Global agri-food trade is undergoing profound structural change, driven by escalating geopolitical tensions, climate-related shocks, and evolving market dynamics. Agri-food...

Global challenges and the EU’s shifting agri-trade goalposts

byHANIOTIS, Tassos
21/08/2025
0

Over the past quarter of a century, the European Union has transformed itself from a defensive agricultural trade player into...

China’s Agri-Food Trade in a Shifting Global Landscape: Policies, Lessons, and Challenges

bySHI, Zhanming,ZHANG, YumeiandLIU, Hongbo
21/08/2025
0

This paper examines the evolution of China’s agri-food trade over the past two decades amid increasing global uncertainty. Using a...

Navigating Uncertainty: Trump and the Changing U.S. Policy for Agri-Food Trade

byTHOMPSON, Robert L.
21/08/2025
0

This paper draws implications of Trump’s re-election for the U.S. agri-food sector and in turn international agri-food trade. It begins...

Keywords

adoption (6) agri-food trade (4) agricultural exports (3) agricultural policy (3) agriculture (13) AKIS (4) Albania (4) CAP (4) Central and Eastern Europe (3) climate change (7) Common Agricultural Policy (3) competitiveness (5) consumer behaviour (3) consumer preferences (4) Covid-19 (6) dairy sector (3) digitalisation (4) economic growth (3) elasticity (3) European Union (8) FADN (3) family farms (4) farm income (3) farm performance (3) food security (6) Hungary (5) impact evaluation (4) innovation (4) Kosovo (3) LEADER (4) off-farm income (4) participation (3) policy (4) price transmission (3) profitability (4) resilience (3) risk management (3) rural areas (4) rural development (13) social capital (3) sustainability (8) sustainable agriculture (4) sustainable development (4) technical efficiency (6) Ukraine (4)
Institute of Agricultural Economics
  • Home
  • About
  • Browse
  • Submission
© 2019 Copyright All rights reserved.
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit an article
  • Browse

© 2019 Copyright All rights reserved.

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.