Studies.hu
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit an article
  • Browse
No Result
View All Result
Studies.hu
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit an article
  • Browse
No Result
View All Result
Studies.hu
No Result
View All Result
Home Browse 2013 – Volume 115 Volume 115 - Issue 1

Economic benefits of precision weed control and why its uptake is so slow

byTAKACSNE GYORGY, Katalin,LENCSES, EnikoandTAKACS, István
  • Year 2013
  • Volume 115
  • Issue 1
  • Pages 40-46

Innovation in agriculture ensures the widespread use of the most up-to-date technology. One such technology is precision crop protection, which meets the requirement of environmental and economic sustainability. The applicability of precision crop protection has been verified by several studies and in practice, but its uptake is very slow. Examining the economic relationships between potential savings and pests at the European Union level, this paper shows that the savings in pesticide use following the adoption of precision plant protection can be 30,000 tonnes (calculated using the current dose levels) per annum. If approximately 30 per cent of the crop producing and mixed farms larger than 16 ESU apply this new technology, the environmental burden will be reduced by 10-35 per cent. From a survey of 72 Hungarian farmers we found a positive correlation between the size of the farm and the adoption of precision farming technology, and those farmers in the survey that had implemented precision crop production estimated that the consequent change in income had been positive. Thus, at a certain farm size and farming intensity, precision crop production is a real, environmental friendly farming strategy option, through which each farm can generate an income that covers at least the economic conditions of simple production. By encouraging environmentally friendly farming practice, precision crop production can meet the requirements of the proposed green component of Pillar 1 of the Common Agricultural Policy for the period 2014-2020.

Tags: Greeningpest controlprecision farmingtechnology uptake
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.7896/j.1222
Download PDF
Previous Post

Comparison between the United States and Poland of consumers’ perceptions of organic products

Next Post

Implications of conceptual and data complexities on time-series econometric applications in market integration analysis

Search

No Result
View All Result

Journal Metrics

Scimago Journal & Country Rank

 

 

 

 

  • Scopus SJR (2025): 0.27
  • Scopus CiteScore (2025): 2.0
  • WoS Journal Impact Factor (2025): 1.4
  • WoS 5 year Impact Factor (2025): 1.4
  • ISSN (electronic): 2063-0476
  • ISSN-L 1418-2106

 

Impressum

Publisher Name: Institute of Agricultural Economics Nonprofit Kft. (AKI)

Publisher Headquarters: Zsil utca 3-5, 1093-Budapest, Hungary

Name of Responsible Person for Publishing:        Dr. Pal Goda

Name of Responsible Person for Editing:             Dr. Attila Jambor

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The publication cost of the journal is supported by the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.

GDPR – Content Alert

 

GDPR – Submission

 

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement (PEMS)

 

Instructions for Authors

Most viewed

Reimagining the Common Agricultural Policy: Competing Rationales for the CAP after 2027

byMATTHEWS, Alan
24/08/2026
0

The reform of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) for the period after 2027 has reopened fundamental questions regarding the purpose,...

Multi-Model Analysis for Policy in Agricultural Economics: A Conceptual Framework

byGONZALEZ-MARTINEZ, Ana RosaandJONGENEEL, Roel
24/08/2026
0

The complexity of the issues that practitioners in the field of agricultural economics encounter is increasing, with agriculture intersecting with...

Assessing the 2028–2034 CAP Reform: A Budget- and Payment-Driven Scenario Analysis Using the GLOBIOM Partial Equilibrium Model

byHRISTOV, Jordan,FRANK, Stefan,KRISZTIN, Tamas,HAVLIK, PetrandHANIOTIS, Tassos
24/08/2026
0

The European Commission’s July 2025 Multiannual Financial Framework proposal introduces structural changes to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) for the...

The CAP and the Future of Rural Areas: Competing Rural Development Strategies in Europe from a Political Economy Perspective

byMANTINO, Francesco
24/08/2026
0

This article develops a political economy framework to interpret the evolution of rural development policy in Europe. It argues that...

Keywords

adoption (6) agri-food trade (4) agricultural exports (3) agricultural policy (3) agriculture (14) AKIS (4) Albania (5) CAP (4) CAP Reform (4) Central and Eastern Europe (3) climate change (7) Common Agricultural Policy (5) competitiveness (5) consumer behaviour (4) consumer preferences (5) Covid-19 (7) dairy sector (3) digitalisation (4) economic growth (3) efficiency (4) elasticity (3) European Union (8) FADN (3) family farms (4) farm income (3) farm performance (3) food security (6) Hungary (6) impact evaluation (4) innovation (5) Kosovo (4) LEADER (4) off-farm income (4) policy (4) price transmission (3) profitability (6) resilience (3) risk management (3) rural areas (4) rural development (13) sustainability (8) sustainable agriculture (5) sustainable development (4) technical efficiency (6) Ukraine (4)
Institute of Agricultural Economics
  • Home
  • About
  • Browse
  • Submission
© 2019 Copyright All rights reserved.
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit an article
  • Browse

© 2019 Copyright All rights reserved.

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.