Studies.hu
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit an article
  • Browse
No Result
View All Result
Studies.hu
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit an article
  • Browse
No Result
View All Result
Studies.hu
No Result
View All Result
Home Browse 2016 – Volume 118 Volume 118 - Issue 3

Measurement of sustainability in agriculture: a review of indicators

byLATRUFFE, Laure,DIAZABAKANA, Ambre,BOCKSTALLER, Christian,DESJEUX, Yann,FINN, John,KELLY, Edel,RYAN, MaryandUTHES, Sandra
  • Year 2016
  • Volume 118
  • Issue 3
  • Pages 123-130

In recent decades, the concept of sustainability has become increasingly prominent in agricultural policy debates. This has led more and more stakeholders to pay attention to the questions of monitoring and evaluation of agricultural practices, and raised the question of appropriate indicators to assess sustainability aspects of given practices. We provide here a review of indicators of sustainability for agriculture. We describe sustainability indicators used in the literature following the typology based on the three sustainability pillars: environmental, economic and social. The literature review shows that the environmental pillar has undergone an ‘indicator explosion’, due to the multitude of themes covered and the attention given by society to this dimension of sustainability. By contrast, economic indicators target a relatively small number of themes. Social indicators typically cover two main themes: sustainability relating to the farming community and sustainability relating to society as a whole. The measurement of these social indicators is challenging as they are often qualitative and may therefore be considered subjective. Careful attention should be given to the choice of indicators, since the data measured will infl uence the calculation of that indicator and therefore the outcome of the analysis. It should first be decided whether individual or composite indicators are preferable, and whether single indicators or a set of indicators should be used. Also, sustainability assessments should be validated, credible and reproducible. Several selection criteria are provided in the literature, such as representativeness, transferability, adaptability and measurability at an acceptable cost.

Tags: composite indicatorsdataindicator selectionindicator typologystakeholders
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.7896/j.1624
Download PDF
Previous Post

Stakeholders’ perceptions of sustainability measurement at farm level

Next Post

FLINT – Farm-level Indicators for New Topics in policy evaluation: an introduction

Search

No Result
View All Result

Journal Metrics

Scimago Journal & Country Rank

 

 

 

 

  • Scopus SJR (2024): 0.37
  • Scopus CiteScore (2024): 2.5
  • WoS Journal Impact Factor (2024): 1.0
  • WoS 5 year Impact Factor (2024): 1.2
  • ISSN (electronic): 2063-0476
  • ISSN-L 1418-2106

 

Impressum

Publisher Name: Institute of Agricultural Economics Nonprofit Kft. (AKI)

Publisher Headquarters: Zsil utca 3-5, 1093-Budapest, Hungary

Name of Responsible Person for Publishing:        Dr. Pal Goda

Name of Responsible Person for Editing:             Dr. Attila Jambor

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The publication cost of the journal is supported by the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.

GDPR – Content Alert

 

GDPR – Submission

 

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement (PEMS)

 

Instructions for Authors

Most viewed

Do short food supply chains impact on efficiency of farms? Evidence from Poland and Czechia

bySMEDZIK-AMBROZY, Katarzyna,SAPA, Agnieszka,BORYCHOWSKI, Michal,STEPIEN, Sebastian,SVOBODOVA, Eliska,ZDRAHAL, Ivo,LATEGAN, FrancoisandGREGA, Libor
10/12/2025
0

Short food supply chains (SFSCs) are a model promoted among farmers in many countries. This model is popularised as an...

From Small Farms to Large Holdings: The Growing Land Disparity in Estonian Agriculture

byJARVE, MariiandJURGENSON, Evelin
10/12/2025
0

Rather than supporting small agricultural households and rural communities, governments frequently prioritise top-down, extractive, and resource-intensive approaches to agricultural development....

Multidimensional evaluation of Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation Systems

byKRANITZ, Livia,GAL, TamasandGODA, Pal
10/12/2025
0

The Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation Systems (AKIS) are responsible for the flow of information, knowledge, and innovation between the actors...

Impact of Basic Human Values on Alcohol Use as a Coping Strategy During Chronic Stress: Insights for Sustainable Health Behaviours

byBAKUCS, L. Zoltan,BENEDEK, Zsofia,FERTO, ImreandFOGARASI, Jozsef
10/12/2025
0

Alcohol misuse has been a persistent challenge in Hungary, and the COVID 19 pandemic intensified the complexities of how people...

Keywords

adoption (6) agri-food trade (4) agricultural exports (3) agricultural policy (3) agriculture (13) AKIS (4) Albania (4) CAP (4) Central and Eastern Europe (3) climate change (7) Common Agricultural Policy (4) competitiveness (5) consumer behaviour (4) consumer preferences (5) Covid-19 (7) dairy sector (3) digitalisation (4) economic growth (3) efficiency (4) elasticity (3) European Union (8) FADN (3) family farms (4) farm income (3) farm performance (3) food security (6) Hungary (5) impact evaluation (4) innovation (5) Kosovo (3) LEADER (4) off-farm income (4) policy (4) price transmission (3) productivity (3) profitability (5) resilience (3) risk management (3) rural areas (4) rural development (13) sustainability (8) sustainable agriculture (4) sustainable development (4) technical efficiency (6) Ukraine (4)
Institute of Agricultural Economics
  • Home
  • About
  • Browse
  • Submission
© 2019 Copyright All rights reserved.
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit an article
  • Browse

© 2019 Copyright All rights reserved.

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.