Studies.hu
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit an article
  • Browse
No Result
View All Result
Studies.hu
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit an article
  • Browse
No Result
View All Result
Studies.hu
No Result
View All Result
Home Browse 2011 - Volume 113 Volume 113 - Issue 1

The impact of crop protection on agricultural production

byPOPP, JozsefandHANTOS, Krisztina
  • Year 2011
  • Volume 113
  • Issue 1
  • Pages 47-66

Chemical pesticides will continue to play a role in pest management for the future. In many situations, the benefits of pesticide use are high relative to the risks or there are no practical alternatives. The number and diversity of biological sources will increase, and products that originate in chemistry laboratories will be designed for particular target sites. Innovations in pesticide delivery systems in plants promise to reduce adverse environmental impacts even further. The correct use of pesticides can deliver significant socioeconomic and environmental benefits in the form of safe, healthy, affordable food; and enable sustainable farm management by improving the efficiency with which we use natural resources such as soil, water and overall land use. Genetically engineered organisms that reduce pest pressure constitute a “new generation” of pest management tools. The use of transgenic crops will probably maintain, or even increase, the need for effective resistance management programmes. However, there remains a need for new chemicals that are compatible with ecologically based pest management and applicator and worker safety. Evaluation of the effectiveness of biocontrol agents should involve consideration of long-term impacts rather than only short-term yield, as is typically done for conventional practices. But it makes sense to establish a legal framework that enables organic and pesticide-free markets to emerge and prosper so that consumers can be given an informed choice between lines of products that vary with pest management. The justifications of government intervention in the management of pest control include the need to address the externality problems associated with the human and environmental health effects of pesticides. There is underinvestment from a social perspective in private sector research because companies will compare their expected profits from their patented products resulting from research and will not consider the benefits to consumers and users. Another reason why public research might lead to innovations that elude the private sector is the different incentives that researchers in the private and public sectors face.

Tags: agriculturebiopesticidecost and benefitcrop lossescrop protectionpesticide
Download PDF
Previous Post

The Comparative Cost and Profit Analysis of Organic and Conventional Farming

Next Post

How does it work for Hungarian food consumers? A medium-term analysis

Search

No Result
View All Result

Journal Metrics

Scimago Journal & Country Rank

 

 

 

 

  • Scopus SJR (2024): 0.37
  • Scopus CiteScore (2024): 2.5
  • WoS Journal Impact Factor (2024): 1.0
  • WoS 5 year Impact Factor (2024): 1.2
  • ISSN (electronic): 2063-0476
  • ISSN-L 1418-2106

 

Impressum

Publisher Name: Institute of Agricultural Economics Nonprofit Kft. (AKI)

Publisher Headquarters: Zsil utca 3-5, 1093-Budapest, Hungary

Name of Responsible Person for Publishing:        Dr. Pal Goda

Name of Responsible Person for Editing:             Dr. Attila Jambor

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The publication cost of the journal is supported by the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.

GDPR – Content Alert

 

GDPR – Submission

 

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement (PEMS)

 

Instructions for Authors

Most viewed

Recent trends in agri-food trade and the future in a changing geopolitical environment

bySANTERAMO, Fabio G.
21/08/2025
0

Global agri-food trade is undergoing profound structural change, driven by escalating geopolitical tensions, climate-related shocks, and evolving market dynamics. Agri-food...

Global challenges and the EU’s shifting agri-trade goalposts

byHANIOTIS, Tassos
21/08/2025
0

Over the past quarter of a century, the European Union has transformed itself from a defensive agricultural trade player into...

China’s Agri-Food Trade in a Shifting Global Landscape: Policies, Lessons, and Challenges

bySHI, Zhanming,ZHANG, YumeiandLIU, Hongbo
21/08/2025
0

This paper examines the evolution of China’s agri-food trade over the past two decades amid increasing global uncertainty. Using a...

Navigating Uncertainty: Trump and the Changing U.S. Policy for Agri-Food Trade

byTHOMPSON, Robert L.
21/08/2025
0

This paper draws implications of Trump’s re-election for the U.S. agri-food sector and in turn international agri-food trade. It begins...

Keywords

adoption (6) agri-food trade (4) agricultural exports (3) agricultural policy (3) agriculture (13) AKIS (4) Albania (4) CAP (4) Central and Eastern Europe (3) climate change (7) Common Agricultural Policy (3) competitiveness (5) consumer behaviour (3) consumer preferences (4) Covid-19 (6) dairy sector (3) digitalisation (4) economic growth (3) elasticity (3) European Union (8) FADN (3) family farms (4) farm income (3) farm performance (3) food security (6) Hungary (5) impact evaluation (4) innovation (4) Kosovo (3) LEADER (4) off-farm income (4) participation (3) policy (4) price transmission (3) profitability (4) resilience (3) risk management (3) rural areas (4) rural development (13) social capital (3) sustainability (8) sustainable agriculture (4) sustainable development (4) technical efficiency (6) Ukraine (4)
Institute of Agricultural Economics
  • Home
  • About
  • Browse
  • Submission
© 2019 Copyright All rights reserved.
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit an article
  • Browse

© 2019 Copyright All rights reserved.

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.