Studies.hu
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit an article
  • Browse
No Result
View All Result
Studies.hu
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit an article
  • Browse
No Result
View All Result
Studies.hu
No Result
View All Result
Home Browse 2016 – Volume 118 Volume 118 - Issue 1

Rural innovation activities as a means for changing development perspectives – An assessment of more than two decades of promoting LEADER initiatives across the European Union

byDAX, ThomasandOEDL-WIESER, Theresia
  • Year 2016
  • Volume 118
  • Issue 1
  • Pages 30-37

Since the 1990s the LEADER approach has very powerfully addressed the spirit of mobilising actors in the countryside through focusing on endogenous potential and activating local stakeholders across all sectors. Given the long-term experience and wealth of diverse development initiatives across the European Union (EU), the diversity of implementation is huge. Considering the limited fi nancial support as a Community Initiative (until 2006), a signifi cant extension and ‘upgrading’ of LEADER was intended by integrating it into the EU Rural Development Programmes (RDPs) since 2007. The shift from the character of a ‘pilot’ instrument at the start of LEADER to its ‘mainstreaming’ into the RDPs involved radical administrative changes and high expectations of increased impacts. The interest in LEADER practice and effectiveness led to many studies that in general apply a limited perspective of self-evaluation and refl ection on LEADER activities. Its main impact is seen in providing learning processes in rural regions and the effects on changes in local governance through extended involvement of local stakeholders and institutions. This paper provides a synthesis of European experiences and analyses of core changes, in particular by referring to the example of implementation in the Austrian context. The main lessons are based on the refl ection of obstacles and promoting factors of implementation during the last 25 years against the LEADER principles. The limitations in the assessment of LEADER call for a systemic approach that includes interrelations to a much wider degree. LEADER’s legacy is seen well beyond a quantitative measurement, but has to be found in its infl uence on actors’ perspectives, new pathways and strategies
for rural development.

Tags: AustriaLEADERparticipationpolicy assessmentrural developmentsocial innovation
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.7896/j.1535
Download PDF
Previous Post

Innovation in rural development in Puglia, Italy: critical issues and potentialities starting from empirical evidence

Next Post

Understanding the process of social innovation in rural regions: some Hungarian case studies

Search

No Result
View All Result

Journal Metrics

Scimago Journal & Country Rank

 

 

 

 

  • Scopus SJR (2024): 0.37
  • Scopus CiteScore (2024): 2.5
  • WoS Journal Impact Factor (2024): 1.0
  • WoS 5 year Impact Factor (2024): 1.2
  • ISSN (electronic): 2063-0476
  • ISSN-L 1418-2106

 

Impressum

Publisher Name: Institute of Agricultural Economics Nonprofit Kft. (AKI)

Publisher Headquarters: Zsil utca 3-5, 1093-Budapest, Hungary

Name of Responsible Person for Publishing:        Dr. Pal Goda

Name of Responsible Person for Editing:             Dr. Attila Jambor

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The publication cost of the journal is supported by the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.

GDPR – Content Alert

 

GDPR – Submission

 

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement (PEMS)

 

Instructions for Authors

Most viewed

Recent trends in agri-food trade and the future in a changing geopolitical environment

bySANTERAMO, Fabio G.
21/08/2025
0

Global agri-food trade is undergoing profound structural change, driven by escalating geopolitical tensions, climate-related shocks, and evolving market dynamics. Agri-food...

Global challenges and the EU’s shifting agri-trade goalposts

byHANIOTIS, Tassos
21/08/2025
0

Over the past quarter of a century, the European Union has transformed itself from a defensive agricultural trade player into...

China’s Agri-Food Trade in a Shifting Global Landscape: Policies, Lessons, and Challenges

bySHI, Zhanming,ZHANG, YumeiandLIU, Hongbo
21/08/2025
0

This paper examines the evolution of China’s agri-food trade over the past two decades amid increasing global uncertainty. Using a...

Navigating Uncertainty: Trump and the Changing U.S. Policy for Agri-Food Trade

byTHOMPSON, Robert L.
21/08/2025
0

This paper draws implications of Trump’s re-election for the U.S. agri-food sector and in turn international agri-food trade. It begins...

Keywords

adoption (6) agri-food trade (4) agricultural exports (3) agricultural policy (3) agriculture (13) AKIS (4) Albania (4) CAP (4) Central and Eastern Europe (3) climate change (7) Common Agricultural Policy (3) competitiveness (5) consumer behaviour (3) consumer preferences (4) Covid-19 (6) dairy sector (3) digitalisation (4) economic growth (3) elasticity (3) European Union (8) FADN (3) family farms (4) farm income (3) farm performance (3) food security (6) Hungary (5) impact evaluation (4) innovation (4) Kosovo (3) LEADER (4) off-farm income (4) participation (3) policy (4) price transmission (3) profitability (4) resilience (3) risk management (3) rural areas (4) rural development (13) social capital (3) sustainability (8) sustainable agriculture (4) sustainable development (4) technical efficiency (6) Ukraine (4)
Institute of Agricultural Economics
  • Home
  • About
  • Browse
  • Submission
© 2019 Copyright All rights reserved.
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit an article
  • Browse

© 2019 Copyright All rights reserved.

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.