Studies.hu
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit an article
  • Browse
No Result
View All Result
Studies.hu
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit an article
  • Browse
No Result
View All Result
Studies.hu
No Result
View All Result
Home Browse 2016 – Volume 118 Volume 118 - Issue 1

Participation of disadvantaged groups and governance in the LEADER and PRODER programmes in Andalucía, Spain

byNAVARRO, Francisco,CEJUDO, EugenioandMAROTO, Juan
  • Year 2016
  • Volume 118
  • Issue 1
  • Pages 47-54

The involvement of disadvantaged groups in European Union neo-endogenous rural development programmes, such as the LEADER programme, must be a high priority. In this paper we study the profiles of the beneficiaries of LEADER and PRODER, the main Spanish example of mainstreaming the LEADER method, in the NUTS 2 region of Andalucía, Spain in the period 2002-2008, and of the decision makers in the Local Action Groups (LAGs). Using quantitative information provided by the regional administration and a questionnaire survey of managers of the LAGs, we show that there has been continuing underrepresentation of previously disadvantaged groups and territories, so contributing to uneven and selective empowerment and governance that favours the emergence of a project class. The groups that have benefited the most from LEADER investments have been entrepreneurs and ‘town halls’, in this order. Interviewed LAG managers felt that many mistakes had been made in the application of LEADER: excessive bureaucracy and interventionism by the regional administration, loss of the original philosophy, low participation of disadvantaged groups and lack of strategic vision. As was noted by one of the LAG managers, “LEADER has been a victim of its own success; the universalisation of its method has led to the elimination of its experimental nature as a real laboratory for the development of rural areas”.

Tags: disadvantaged groupslocal developmentneo-endogenous rural developmentparticipation
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.7896/j.1532
Download PDF
Previous Post

Perceptions of the support granted to female entrepreneurs in Romania: between anticipation and assessment

Next Post

Innovation in rural development in Puglia, Italy: critical issues and potentialities starting from empirical evidence

Search

No Result
View All Result

Journal Metrics

Scimago Journal & Country Rank

 

 

 

 

  • Scopus SJR (2025): 0.27
  • Scopus CiteScore (2025): 2.0
  • WoS Journal Impact Factor (2025): 1.4
  • WoS 5 year Impact Factor (2025): 1.4
  • ISSN (electronic): 2063-0476
  • ISSN-L 1418-2106

 

Impressum

Publisher Name: Institute of Agricultural Economics Nonprofit Kft. (AKI)

Publisher Headquarters: Zsil utca 3-5, 1093-Budapest, Hungary

Name of Responsible Person for Publishing:        Dr. Pal Goda

Name of Responsible Person for Editing:             Dr. Attila Jambor

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The publication cost of the journal is supported by the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.

GDPR – Content Alert

 

GDPR – Submission

 

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement (PEMS)

 

Instructions for Authors

Most viewed

Reimagining the Common Agricultural Policy: Competing Rationales for the CAP after 2027

byMATTHEWS, Alan
24/08/2026
0

The reform of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) for the period after 2027 has reopened fundamental questions regarding the purpose,...

Multi-Model Analysis for Policy in Agricultural Economics: A Conceptual Framework

byGONZALEZ-MARTINEZ, Ana RosaandJONGENEEL, Roel
24/08/2026
0

The complexity of the issues that practitioners in the field of agricultural economics encounter is increasing, with agriculture intersecting with...

Assessing the 2028–2034 CAP Reform: A Budget- and Payment-Driven Scenario Analysis Using the GLOBIOM Partial Equilibrium Model

byHRISTOV, Jordan,FRANK, Stefan,KRISZTIN, Tamas,HAVLIK, PetrandHANIOTIS, Tassos
24/08/2026
0

The European Commission’s July 2025 Multiannual Financial Framework proposal introduces structural changes to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) for the...

The CAP and the Future of Rural Areas: Competing Rural Development Strategies in Europe from a Political Economy Perspective

byMANTINO, Francesco
24/08/2026
0

This article develops a political economy framework to interpret the evolution of rural development policy in Europe. It argues that...

Keywords

adoption (6) agri-food trade (4) agricultural exports (3) agricultural policy (3) agriculture (14) AKIS (4) Albania (5) CAP (4) CAP Reform (4) Central and Eastern Europe (3) climate change (7) Common Agricultural Policy (5) competitiveness (5) consumer behaviour (4) consumer preferences (5) Covid-19 (7) dairy sector (3) digitalisation (4) economic growth (3) efficiency (4) elasticity (3) European Union (8) FADN (3) family farms (4) farm income (3) farm performance (3) food security (6) Hungary (6) impact evaluation (4) innovation (5) Kosovo (4) LEADER (4) off-farm income (4) policy (4) price transmission (3) profitability (6) resilience (3) risk management (3) rural areas (4) rural development (13) sustainability (8) sustainable agriculture (5) sustainable development (4) technical efficiency (6) Ukraine (4)
Institute of Agricultural Economics
  • Home
  • About
  • Browse
  • Submission
© 2019 Copyright All rights reserved.
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit an article
  • Browse

© 2019 Copyright All rights reserved.

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.