Studies.hu
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit an article
  • Browse
No Result
View All Result
Studies.hu
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit an article
  • Browse
No Result
View All Result
Studies.hu
No Result
View All Result
Home Browse 2020 - Volume 122 Volume 122 - Issue 3

Consumer perception of Hungarian agroforestry products – results of a Q-methodology attitude research study

bySZERB, Boglarka,HORVATH, JolanandSZENTE, Viktoria
  • Year 2020
  • Volume 122
  • Issue 3
  • Pages 124-131

In our study we investigated agroforestry systems and the market for products derived from them, from a consumer perspective. Agroforestry products are not yet in the public domain, so our research focused on the latent market for agroforestry products. This allowed the participants to form only an opinion, reactions which we were able to reveal using the Q-method. In our study, we targeted average consumers who are independent from agroforestry systems and products. Out of the 174 Q-Sort questionnaires, 85 were filled out with valid responses. As a result of our Q-analysis, we created 4 factors in order to minimise the number of factors and achieve a given level of total variance. Factor ‘A’ (N=26) “Alternative, Green Consumers” are committed to the  products of the sustainable economy, so agroforestry products would also be of interest. Factor ‘B’ (N=21) “Inquisitive Consumers” are interested in and eager to be informed about the products purchased, and they are willing to pay more for agroforestry products. For Factor ‘C’ (N=10) “Busy Consumers”, the low ecological footprint of agroforestry products is a big advantage, and they can be reached with articles published on various news portals and online media most effectively. Opinion Groups ‘A’ and ‘B’ choose the traditional market for their purchases – this is why direct selling at local or farmers’ markets, fairs, or short supply chains can be beneficial. Potential consumers also appear to be willing to pay a higher price if they find an attractive product from an agroforestry system.

Tags: agroforestryattitudeperceptionQ-methodwillingness to pay
  • https://doi.org/10.7896/j.2077
Download PDF
Previous Post

The impact of Covid-19 on agriculture: evidence from oats and wheat markets

Next Post

Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation Systems in European Union policy discourse: Quo vadis?

Search

No Result
View All Result

Journal Metrics

Scimago Journal & Country Rank

 

 

 

 

  • Scopus SJR (2025): 0.27
  • Scopus CiteScore (2025): 2.0
  • WoS Journal Impact Factor (2025): 1.4
  • WoS 5 year Impact Factor (2025): 1.4
  • ISSN (electronic): 2063-0476
  • ISSN-L 1418-2106

 

Impressum

Publisher Name: Institute of Agricultural Economics Nonprofit Kft. (AKI)

Publisher Headquarters: Zsil utca 3-5, 1093-Budapest, Hungary

Name of Responsible Person for Publishing:        Dr. Pal Goda

Name of Responsible Person for Editing:             Dr. Attila Jambor

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The publication cost of the journal is supported by the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.

GDPR – Content Alert

 

GDPR – Submission

 

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement (PEMS)

 

Instructions for Authors

Most viewed

Reimagining the Common Agricultural Policy: Competing Rationales for the CAP after 2027

byMATTHEWS, Alan
24/08/2026
0

The reform of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) for the period after 2027 has reopened fundamental questions regarding the purpose,...

Multi-Model Analysis for Policy in Agricultural Economics: A Conceptual Framework

byGONZALEZ-MARTINEZ, Ana RosaandJONGENEEL, Roel
24/08/2026
0

The complexity of the issues that practitioners in the field of agricultural economics encounter is increasing, with agriculture intersecting with...

Assessing the 2028–2034 CAP Reform: A Budget- and Payment-Driven Scenario Analysis Using the GLOBIOM Partial Equilibrium Model

byHRISTOV, Jordan,FRANK, Stefan,KRISZTIN, Tamas,HAVLIK, PetrandHANIOTIS, Tassos
24/08/2026
0

The European Commission’s July 2025 Multiannual Financial Framework proposal introduces structural changes to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) for the...

The CAP and the Future of Rural Areas: Competing Rural Development Strategies in Europe from a Political Economy Perspective

byMANTINO, Francesco
24/08/2026
0

This article develops a political economy framework to interpret the evolution of rural development policy in Europe. It argues that...

Keywords

adoption (6) agri-food trade (4) agricultural exports (3) agricultural policy (3) agriculture (14) AKIS (4) Albania (5) CAP (4) CAP Reform (4) Central and Eastern Europe (3) climate change (7) Common Agricultural Policy (5) competitiveness (5) consumer behaviour (4) consumer preferences (5) Covid-19 (7) dairy sector (3) digitalisation (4) economic growth (3) efficiency (4) elasticity (3) European Union (8) FADN (3) family farms (4) farm income (3) farm performance (3) food security (6) Hungary (6) impact evaluation (4) innovation (5) Kosovo (4) LEADER (4) off-farm income (4) policy (4) price transmission (3) profitability (6) resilience (3) risk management (3) rural areas (4) rural development (13) sustainability (8) sustainable agriculture (5) sustainable development (4) technical efficiency (6) Ukraine (4)
Institute of Agricultural Economics
  • Home
  • About
  • Browse
  • Submission
© 2019 Copyright All rights reserved.
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit an article
  • Browse

© 2019 Copyright All rights reserved.

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.