• Home
  • About
  • Submit an article
  • Browse
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit an article
  • Browse
No Result
View All Result
Akistudies
No Result
View All Result
Home Browse 2011 - Volume 113 Volume 113 - Issue 2

Cohesion Policy for rural areas after 2013. A rationale derived from the EDORA project (European Development Opportunities in Rural Areas) – ESPON 2013 Project 2013/1/2

byCOPUS, Andrew,SHUCKSMITH, Mark,DAX, ThomasandMEREDITH, David
  • Year 2011
  • Volume 113
  • Issue 2
  • Pages 121-132

The starting point of the EDORA project was the recognition that, rather than becoming more uniform in character, rural Europe is, in many ways, becoming increasingly diverse, implying new challenges and opportunities. The project’s overarching aim was to examine the process of differentiation, in order to better understand how EU policy can enable rural areas to build upon their specific potentials to achieve ‘smart, sustainable and inclusive growth’. The first phase of the project consisted of a literature review in order to establish a conceptual framework for subsequent empirical analysis. This identified a very wide range of aspects of contemporary rural change. In order to manage this complexity, and so that it could be communicated simply and clearly, three ‘meta-narratives’ of rural change were devised. In the second phase the evidence base for rural change was explored, both in terms of large scale patterns, based upon regional data, and local processes. The macro-scale patterns were addressed by three typologies. These were complemented at a micro-level by in-depth studies of 12 exemplar regions, reflecting a wide range of types and contexts. The third phase explored policy implications. The project’s findings point towards neo-endogenous approaches, in which a ‘bottom up’ process of regional programme design is fully supported and guided by available information, expert advice and the kind of strategic perspective which is best assembled at a central level. The EDORA findings are thus generally supportive of the ‘place based’ approaches advocated by the Barca Report.

Tags: local assemblages of territorial assetspatterns of interactionprocesses of contemporary rural changeregional typologiesrural cohesion policy
Download PDF
Previous Post

With ‘Regional Territorial Agendas’ towards territorial cohesion? The emergence of supra-regional coalitions in Europe and their future role in Cohesion Policy

Next Post

Factors of population decline in rural areas and answers given in EU member states’ strategies

Search

No Result
View All Result

Journal Metrics

Scimago Journal & Country Rank

 

 

 

 

  • Scopus SJR (2022): 0.27
  • Scopus CiteScore (2022): 2.0
  • WoS AIS (2022): 0.23
  • WoS JCI (2022): 0.37
  • ISSN (electronic): 2063-0476
  • ISSN-L 1418-2106

 

Impressum

Publisher Name: Institute of Agricultural Economics Nonprofit Kft. (AKI)

Publisher Headquarters: Zsil utca 3-5, 1093-Budapest, Hungary

Name of Responsible Person for Publishing:        Dr. Pal Goda

Name of Responsible Person for Editing:             Dr. Attila Jambor

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The publication cost of the journal is supported by the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.

GDPR – Content Alert

 

GDPR – Submission

 

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement (PEMS)

 

Instructions for Authors

Most viewed

Information behaviour of farmers, foresters, and advisors in the context of digitalisation in the EU

byKIRALY, Gabor,VAGO, Szabolcs,BULL, Emily,CRUYSSEN, Laurens van der,ARBOUR, Tyler,SPANOGHE, Pieterandvan DIJK, Lisa
10/04/2023
0

This paper provides insights into the information behaviour of European farmers, foresters, and advisors in the context of the ongoing...

Embeddedness of Hungarian pig prices in the European pork market: a volatility spillover and partial wavelet coherence study

bySZABO, Zsolt,SZENDERAK, Janos,SZILI, Viktor,EGRI, EditandMOLNAR, Zsuzsa
10/04/2023
0

Compared to most of the agricultural commodity markets in the European Union (EU), the pig market is less regulated and...

Factors influencing farmers’ willingness to participate in Farm to School programmes – The case of Albania

bySHAHU, Edmira,HOXHA, Aurora,ZHLLIMA, Edvin,IMAMI, DriniandGJIKA, Irena
10/04/2023
0

Farm to school (F2S) programmes ensure school pupils receive an appropriate diet, fight malnutrition, and motivate children to attend school....

Farmer-owned brand purchases: The importance of label comprehension and price fairness perception

byGRASHUIS, JasperandSU, Ye
10/04/2023
0

The farmer-owned label is a relatively recent addition to the crowded landscape of information on food and drink product packages....

Keywords

adoption (5) agricultural exports (3) agriculture (12) AKIS (3) CAP (3) Central and Eastern Europe (3) climate change (5) Common Agricultural Policy (3) competitiveness (5) consumer behaviour (3) consumer preferences (4) Covid-19 (4) dairy farms (3) dairy sector (2) Data Envelopment Analysis (3) economic growth (3) efficiency (3) elasticity (3) European Union (7) export (2) FADN (3) family farms (4) farmers (3) farm income (3) Hungary (5) impact evaluation (4) innovation (4) Kosovo (3) LEADER (4) maize (3) off-farm income (4) participation (3) policy (4) price transmission (3) resilience (2) risk management (3) Romania (2) rural areas (4) rural development (13) social capital (3) social innovation (3) Structural Funds (3) sustainability (5) sustainable agriculture (4) technical efficiency (6)
Institute of Agricultural Economics
  • Home
  • About
  • Browse
  • Submission
© 2019 Copyright All rights reserved.
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit an article
  • Browse

© 2019 Copyright All rights reserved.

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.