Studies.hu
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit an article
  • Browse
No Result
View All Result
Studies.hu
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit an article
  • Browse
No Result
View All Result
Studies.hu
No Result
View All Result
Home Browse 2013 – Volume 115 Volume 115 - Issue 1

Economic benefits of precision weed control and why its uptake is so slow

byTAKACSNE GYORGY, Katalin,LENCSES, EnikoandTAKACS, István
  • Year 2013
  • Volume 115
  • Issue 1
  • Pages 40-46

Innovation in agriculture ensures the widespread use of the most up-to-date technology. One such technology is precision crop protection, which meets the requirement of environmental and economic sustainability. The applicability of precision crop protection has been verified by several studies and in practice, but its uptake is very slow. Examining the economic relationships between potential savings and pests at the European Union level, this paper shows that the savings in pesticide use following the adoption of precision plant protection can be 30,000 tonnes (calculated using the current dose levels) per annum. If approximately 30 per cent of the crop producing and mixed farms larger than 16 ESU apply this new technology, the environmental burden will be reduced by 10-35 per cent. From a survey of 72 Hungarian farmers we found a positive correlation between the size of the farm and the adoption of precision farming technology, and those farmers in the survey that had implemented precision crop production estimated that the consequent change in income had been positive. Thus, at a certain farm size and farming intensity, precision crop production is a real, environmental friendly farming strategy option, through which each farm can generate an income that covers at least the economic conditions of simple production. By encouraging environmentally friendly farming practice, precision crop production can meet the requirements of the proposed green component of Pillar 1 of the Common Agricultural Policy for the period 2014-2020.

Tags: Greeningpest controlprecision farmingtechnology uptake
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.7896/j.1222
Download PDF
Previous Post

Comparison between the United States and Poland of consumers’ perceptions of organic products

Next Post

Implications of conceptual and data complexities on time-series econometric applications in market integration analysis

Search

No Result
View All Result

Journal Metrics

Scimago Journal & Country Rank

 

 

 

 

  • Scopus SJR (2024): 0.37
  • Scopus CiteScore (2022): 2.0
  • WoS Journal Impact Factor (2023): 0.9
  • WoS Journal Citation Indicator (2023): 0.33
  • ISSN (electronic): 2063-0476
  • ISSN-L 1418-2106

 

Impressum

Publisher Name: Institute of Agricultural Economics Nonprofit Kft. (AKI)

Publisher Headquarters: Zsil utca 3-5, 1093-Budapest, Hungary

Name of Responsible Person for Publishing:        Dr. Pal Goda

Name of Responsible Person for Editing:             Dr. Attila Jambor

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The publication cost of the journal is supported by the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.

GDPR – Content Alert

 

GDPR – Submission

 

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement (PEMS)

 

Instructions for Authors

Most viewed

Economic Diversification Potential: Insights from Mongolia’s Livestock Product Value Chains

byDAGYS, Kadirbyek,HEIJMAN, Wim,DRIES, Liesbeth,AGIPAR, Bakyei,YETYEKBAI, Myeruyert,DAMDINSUREN, MyagmarsurenandTSAMBA, Gantulga
16/04/2025
0

Mongolia, endowed with abundant natural resources, faces a critical challenge in reducing its reliance on the mining sector and achieving...

The Effects of Investment Support on Performance of Farms: The Case of Application of the Rural Development Programme in Slovakia

byPOKRIVCAK, Jan,MICHALEK, Jerzy,CIAIAN, Pavel,PIHULIC, MarekandSOPAJ HOXHA, Leonora
16/04/2025
0

The paper estimates the firm level impact of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) investment subsidies on gross value added, profits,...

Farm Characteristics and Resources: The C5.0 Classification Tree as a Means Towards Understanding Finnish Family Farmers’ Perceptions of Success

byYIGIT, Furkan,SIPILAINEN, TimoandRANTAMAKI-LAHTINEN, Leena
16/04/2025
0

This study investigates the classification of the family farmers’ perceptions of success, based on characteristics and resources. The empirical analysis...

The Impact of Climate Change on Food Security: Evidence from Panel Data Analysis in Central Asia

byBOPUSHEV, Stalbek,TOKOBAEV, NurlanandSULTAKEEV, Kadyrbek
16/04/2025
0

Climate change leads to various impacts, including reduced production, lower crop yields, land degradation, soil erosion, and overall, food insecurity....

Keywords

adoption (6) agricultural exports (3) agriculture (13) AKIS (4) Albania (4) CAP (4) Central and Eastern Europe (3) climate change (7) Common Agricultural Policy (3) competitiveness (5) consumer preferences (4) Covid-19 (6) Data Envelopment Analysis (3) DEA (3) digitalisation (4) economic growth (3) efficiency (3) elasticity (3) European Integration (3) European Union (8) family farms (4) food security (4) Hungary (5) impact evaluation (4) innovation (4) Kosovo (3) LEADER (4) maize (3) off-farm income (4) participation (3) policy (4) price transmission (3) profitability (4) propensity score matching (3) risk management (3) rural areas (4) rural development (13) social capital (3) social innovation (3) Structural Funds (3) sustainability (6) sustainable agriculture (4) sustainable development (4) technical efficiency (6) Ukraine (4)
Institute of Agricultural Economics
  • Home
  • About
  • Browse
  • Submission
© 2019 Copyright All rights reserved.
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit an article
  • Browse

© 2019 Copyright All rights reserved.

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.