Studies.hu
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit an article
  • Browse
No Result
View All Result
Studies.hu
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit an article
  • Browse
No Result
View All Result
Studies.hu
No Result
View All Result
Home Browse 2011 - Volume 113 Volume 113 - Issue 2

Cohesion Policy for rural areas after 2013. A rationale derived from the EDORA project (European Development Opportunities in Rural Areas) – ESPON 2013 Project 2013/1/2

byCOPUS, Andrew,SHUCKSMITH, Mark,DAX, ThomasandMEREDITH, David
  • Year 2011
  • Volume 113
  • Issue 2
  • Pages 121-132

The starting point of the EDORA project was the recognition that, rather than becoming more uniform in character, rural Europe is, in many ways, becoming increasingly diverse, implying new challenges and opportunities. The project’s overarching aim was to examine the process of differentiation, in order to better understand how EU policy can enable rural areas to build upon their specific potentials to achieve ‘smart, sustainable and inclusive growth’. The first phase of the project consisted of a literature review in order to establish a conceptual framework for subsequent empirical analysis. This identified a very wide range of aspects of contemporary rural change. In order to manage this complexity, and so that it could be communicated simply and clearly, three ‘meta-narratives’ of rural change were devised. In the second phase the evidence base for rural change was explored, both in terms of large scale patterns, based upon regional data, and local processes. The macro-scale patterns were addressed by three typologies. These were complemented at a micro-level by in-depth studies of 12 exemplar regions, reflecting a wide range of types and contexts. The third phase explored policy implications. The project’s findings point towards neo-endogenous approaches, in which a ‘bottom up’ process of regional programme design is fully supported and guided by available information, expert advice and the kind of strategic perspective which is best assembled at a central level. The EDORA findings are thus generally supportive of the ‘place based’ approaches advocated by the Barca Report.

Tags: local assemblages of territorial assetspatterns of interactionprocesses of contemporary rural changeregional typologiesrural cohesion policy
Download PDF
Previous Post

With ‘Regional Territorial Agendas’ towards territorial cohesion? The emergence of supra-regional coalitions in Europe and their future role in Cohesion Policy

Next Post

Factors of population decline in rural areas and answers given in EU member states’ strategies

Search

No Result
View All Result

Journal Metrics

Scimago Journal & Country Rank

 

 

 

 

  • Scopus SJR (2024): 0.37
  • Scopus CiteScore (2024): 2.5
  • WoS Journal Impact Factor (2024): 1.0
  • WoS 5 year Impact Factor (2024): 1.2
  • ISSN (electronic): 2063-0476
  • ISSN-L 1418-2106

 

Impressum

Publisher Name: Institute of Agricultural Economics Nonprofit Kft. (AKI)

Publisher Headquarters: Zsil utca 3-5, 1093-Budapest, Hungary

Name of Responsible Person for Publishing:        Dr. Pal Goda

Name of Responsible Person for Editing:             Dr. Attila Jambor

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The publication cost of the journal is supported by the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.

GDPR – Content Alert

 

GDPR – Submission

 

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement (PEMS)

 

Instructions for Authors

Most viewed

Do short food supply chains impact on efficiency of farms? Evidence from Poland and Czechia

bySMEDZIK-AMBROZY, Katarzyna,SAPA, Agnieszka,BORYCHOWSKI, Michal,STEPIEN, Sebastian,SVOBODOVA, Eliska,ZDRAHAL, Ivo,LATEGAN, FrancoisandGREGA, Libor
10/12/2025
0

Short food supply chains (SFSCs) are a model promoted among farmers in many countries. This model is popularised as an...

From Small Farms to Large Holdings: The Growing Land Disparity in Estonian Agriculture

byJARVE, MariiandJURGENSON, Evelin
10/12/2025
0

Rather than supporting small agricultural households and rural communities, governments frequently prioritise top-down, extractive, and resource-intensive approaches to agricultural development....

Multidimensional evaluation of Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation Systems

byKRANITZ, Livia,GAL, TamasandGODA, Pal
10/12/2025
0

The Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation Systems (AKIS) are responsible for the flow of information, knowledge, and innovation between the actors...

Impact of Basic Human Values on Alcohol Use as a Coping Strategy During Chronic Stress: Insights for Sustainable Health Behaviours

byBAKUCS, L. Zoltan,BENEDEK, Zsofia,FERTO, ImreandFOGARASI, Jozsef
10/12/2025
0

Alcohol misuse has been a persistent challenge in Hungary, and the COVID 19 pandemic intensified the complexities of how people...

Keywords

adoption (6) agri-food trade (4) agricultural exports (3) agricultural policy (3) agriculture (13) AKIS (4) Albania (4) CAP (4) Central and Eastern Europe (3) climate change (7) Common Agricultural Policy (4) competitiveness (5) consumer behaviour (4) consumer preferences (5) Covid-19 (7) dairy sector (3) digitalisation (4) economic growth (3) efficiency (4) elasticity (3) European Union (8) FADN (3) family farms (4) farm income (3) farm performance (3) food security (6) Hungary (5) impact evaluation (4) innovation (5) Kosovo (3) LEADER (4) off-farm income (4) policy (4) price transmission (3) productivity (3) profitability (5) resilience (3) risk management (3) rural areas (4) rural development (13) sustainability (8) sustainable agriculture (4) sustainable development (4) technical efficiency (6) Ukraine (4)
Institute of Agricultural Economics
  • Home
  • About
  • Browse
  • Submission
© 2019 Copyright All rights reserved.
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit an article
  • Browse

© 2019 Copyright All rights reserved.

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.