Studies.hu
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit an article
  • Browse
No Result
View All Result
Studies.hu
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit an article
  • Browse
No Result
View All Result
Studies.hu
No Result
View All Result
Home Browse 2020 - Volume 122 Volume 122 - Issue 3

Consumer perception of Hungarian agroforestry products – results of a Q-methodology attitude research study

bySZERB, Boglarka,HORVATH, JolanandSZENTE, Viktoria
  • Year 2020
  • Volume 122
  • Issue 3
  • Pages 124-131

In our study we investigated agroforestry systems and the market for products derived from them, from a consumer perspective. Agroforestry products are not yet in the public domain, so our research focused on the latent market for agroforestry products. This allowed the participants to form only an opinion, reactions which we were able to reveal using the Q-method. In our study, we targeted average consumers who are independent from agroforestry systems and products. Out of the 174 Q-Sort questionnaires, 85 were filled out with valid responses. As a result of our Q-analysis, we created 4 factors in order to minimise the number of factors and achieve a given level of total variance. Factor ‘A’ (N=26) “Alternative, Green Consumers” are committed to the  products of the sustainable economy, so agroforestry products would also be of interest. Factor ‘B’ (N=21) “Inquisitive Consumers” are interested in and eager to be informed about the products purchased, and they are willing to pay more for agroforestry products. For Factor ‘C’ (N=10) “Busy Consumers”, the low ecological footprint of agroforestry products is a big advantage, and they can be reached with articles published on various news portals and online media most effectively. Opinion Groups ‘A’ and ‘B’ choose the traditional market for their purchases – this is why direct selling at local or farmers’ markets, fairs, or short supply chains can be beneficial. Potential consumers also appear to be willing to pay a higher price if they find an attractive product from an agroforestry system.

Tags: agroforestryattitudeperceptionQ-methodwillingness to pay
  • https://doi.org/10.7896/j.2077
Download PDF
Previous Post

The impact of Covid-19 on agriculture: evidence from oats and wheat markets

Next Post

Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation Systems in European Union policy discourse: Quo vadis?

Search

No Result
View All Result

Journal Metrics

Scimago Journal & Country Rank

 

 

 

 

  • Scopus SJR (2024): 0.37
  • Scopus CiteScore (2024): 2.5
  • WoS Journal Impact Factor (2024): 1.0
  • WoS 5 year Impact Factor (2024): 1.2
  • ISSN (electronic): 2063-0476
  • ISSN-L 1418-2106

 

Impressum

Publisher Name: Institute of Agricultural Economics Nonprofit Kft. (AKI)

Publisher Headquarters: Zsil utca 3-5, 1093-Budapest, Hungary

Name of Responsible Person for Publishing:        Dr. Pal Goda

Name of Responsible Person for Editing:             Dr. Attila Jambor

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The publication cost of the journal is supported by the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.

GDPR – Content Alert

 

GDPR – Submission

 

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement (PEMS)

 

Instructions for Authors

Most viewed

Recent trends in agri-food trade and the future in a changing geopolitical environment

bySANTERAMO, Fabio G.
21/08/2025
0

Global agri-food trade is undergoing profound structural change, driven by escalating geopolitical tensions, climate-related shocks, and evolving market dynamics. Agri-food...

Global challenges and the EU’s shifting agri-trade goalposts

byHANIOTIS, Tassos
21/08/2025
0

Over the past quarter of a century, the European Union has transformed itself from a defensive agricultural trade player into...

China’s Agri-Food Trade in a Shifting Global Landscape: Policies, Lessons, and Challenges

bySHI, Zhanming,ZHANG, YumeiandLIU, Hongbo
21/08/2025
0

This paper examines the evolution of China’s agri-food trade over the past two decades amid increasing global uncertainty. Using a...

Navigating Uncertainty: Trump and the Changing U.S. Policy for Agri-Food Trade

byTHOMPSON, Robert L.
21/08/2025
0

This paper draws implications of Trump’s re-election for the U.S. agri-food sector and in turn international agri-food trade. It begins...

Keywords

adoption (6) agri-food trade (4) agricultural exports (3) agricultural policy (3) agriculture (13) AKIS (4) Albania (4) CAP (4) Central and Eastern Europe (3) climate change (7) Common Agricultural Policy (3) competitiveness (5) consumer behaviour (3) consumer preferences (4) Covid-19 (6) dairy sector (3) digitalisation (4) economic growth (3) elasticity (3) European Union (8) FADN (3) family farms (4) farm income (3) farm performance (3) food security (6) Hungary (5) impact evaluation (4) innovation (4) Kosovo (3) LEADER (4) off-farm income (4) participation (3) policy (4) price transmission (3) profitability (4) resilience (3) risk management (3) rural areas (4) rural development (13) social capital (3) sustainability (8) sustainable agriculture (4) sustainable development (4) technical efficiency (6) Ukraine (4)
Institute of Agricultural Economics
  • Home
  • About
  • Browse
  • Submission
© 2019 Copyright All rights reserved.
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit an article
  • Browse

© 2019 Copyright All rights reserved.

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.