Studies.hu
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit an article
  • Browse
No Result
View All Result
Studies.hu
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit an article
  • Browse
No Result
View All Result
Studies.hu
No Result
View All Result
Home Browse 2020 - Volume 122 Volume 122 - Issue 3

Consumer perception of Hungarian agroforestry products – results of a Q-methodology attitude research study

bySZERB, Boglarka,HORVATH, JolanandSZENTE, Viktoria
  • Year 2020
  • Volume 122
  • Issue 3
  • Pages 124-131

In our study we investigated agroforestry systems and the market for products derived from them, from a consumer perspective. Agroforestry products are not yet in the public domain, so our research focused on the latent market for agroforestry products. This allowed the participants to form only an opinion, reactions which we were able to reveal using the Q-method. In our study, we targeted average consumers who are independent from agroforestry systems and products. Out of the 174 Q-Sort questionnaires, 85 were filled out with valid responses. As a result of our Q-analysis, we created 4 factors in order to minimise the number of factors and achieve a given level of total variance. Factor ‘A’ (N=26) “Alternative, Green Consumers” are committed to the  products of the sustainable economy, so agroforestry products would also be of interest. Factor ‘B’ (N=21) “Inquisitive Consumers” are interested in and eager to be informed about the products purchased, and they are willing to pay more for agroforestry products. For Factor ‘C’ (N=10) “Busy Consumers”, the low ecological footprint of agroforestry products is a big advantage, and they can be reached with articles published on various news portals and online media most effectively. Opinion Groups ‘A’ and ‘B’ choose the traditional market for their purchases – this is why direct selling at local or farmers’ markets, fairs, or short supply chains can be beneficial. Potential consumers also appear to be willing to pay a higher price if they find an attractive product from an agroforestry system.

Tags: agroforestryattitudeperceptionQ-methodwillingness to pay
  • https://doi.org/10.7896/j.2077
Download PDF
Previous Post

The impact of Covid-19 on agriculture: evidence from oats and wheat markets

Next Post

Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation Systems in European Union policy discourse: Quo vadis?

Search

No Result
View All Result

Journal Metrics

Scimago Journal & Country Rank

 

 

 

 

  • Scopus SJR (2024): 0.37
  • Scopus CiteScore (2022): 2.0
  • WoS Journal Impact Factor (2023): 0.9
  • WoS Journal Citation Indicator (2023): 0.33
  • ISSN (electronic): 2063-0476
  • ISSN-L 1418-2106

 

Impressum

Publisher Name: Institute of Agricultural Economics Nonprofit Kft. (AKI)

Publisher Headquarters: Zsil utca 3-5, 1093-Budapest, Hungary

Name of Responsible Person for Publishing:        Dr. Pal Goda

Name of Responsible Person for Editing:             Dr. Attila Jambor

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The publication cost of the journal is supported by the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.

GDPR – Content Alert

 

GDPR – Submission

 

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement (PEMS)

 

Instructions for Authors

Most viewed

Economic Diversification Potential: Insights from Mongolia’s Livestock Product Value Chains

byDAGYS, Kadirbyek,HEIJMAN, Wim,DRIES, Liesbeth,AGIPAR, Bakyei,YETYEKBAI, Myeruyert,DAMDINSUREN, MyagmarsurenandTSAMBA, Gantulga
16/04/2025
0

Mongolia, endowed with abundant natural resources, faces a critical challenge in reducing its reliance on the mining sector and achieving...

The Effects of Investment Support on Performance of Farms: The Case of Application of the Rural Development Programme in Slovakia

byPOKRIVCAK, Jan,MICHALEK, Jerzy,CIAIAN, Pavel,PIHULIC, MarekandSOPAJ HOXHA, Leonora
16/04/2025
0

The paper estimates the firm level impact of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) investment subsidies on gross value added, profits,...

Farm Characteristics and Resources: The C5.0 Classification Tree as a Means Towards Understanding Finnish Family Farmers’ Perceptions of Success

byYIGIT, Furkan,SIPILAINEN, TimoandRANTAMAKI-LAHTINEN, Leena
16/04/2025
0

This study investigates the classification of the family farmers’ perceptions of success, based on characteristics and resources. The empirical analysis...

The Impact of Climate Change on Food Security: Evidence from Panel Data Analysis in Central Asia

byBOPUSHEV, Stalbek,TOKOBAEV, NurlanandSULTAKEEV, Kadyrbek
16/04/2025
0

Climate change leads to various impacts, including reduced production, lower crop yields, land degradation, soil erosion, and overall, food insecurity....

Keywords

adoption (6) agricultural exports (3) agriculture (13) AKIS (4) Albania (4) CAP (4) Central and Eastern Europe (3) climate change (7) Common Agricultural Policy (3) competitiveness (5) consumer preferences (4) Covid-19 (6) Data Envelopment Analysis (3) DEA (3) digitalisation (4) economic growth (3) efficiency (3) elasticity (3) European Integration (3) European Union (8) family farms (4) food security (4) Hungary (5) impact evaluation (4) innovation (4) Kosovo (3) LEADER (4) maize (3) off-farm income (4) participation (3) policy (4) price transmission (3) profitability (4) propensity score matching (3) risk management (3) rural areas (4) rural development (13) social capital (3) social innovation (3) Structural Funds (3) sustainability (6) sustainable agriculture (4) sustainable development (4) technical efficiency (6) Ukraine (4)
Institute of Agricultural Economics
  • Home
  • About
  • Browse
  • Submission
© 2019 Copyright All rights reserved.
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit an article
  • Browse

© 2019 Copyright All rights reserved.

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.